Simply brilliant! If you combine aspects of “Cloverfield”, “28 Days Later” & “Lost in Translation”… you get “Monsters”. Yes, you read that right. It is an oddly wonderful combination brought together by a masterful directorial debut, two incredible performances and a minuscule budget that wouldn’t fund the catering bill on most Hollywood productions.
As I was watching this cinematic gem, I grew more and more content, realizing that I wasn’t stuck watching yet another crappy monster flick. It became gradually apparent that this film had virtually nothing to do with monsters. Rather, it was a love story along the lines of the one we were privileged to witness in Sofia Coppola’s masterpiece, “Lost in Translation”. Sure, the setting could not be more different… But the tone and the characters are ultimately similar. “Monsters” is a relationship movie with scary creatures in the distant background.
A photographer named Andrew (Scoot McNairy) is asked to escort a young woman named Sam (Whitney Able) across an infected zone along the border of Mexico and the United States. That zone is plagued with giant tentacled creatures who have arrived on earth after one of NASA’s space crafts returns from a mission and breaks up on re-entry. But forget all of that nonsense… it has little bearing on the real story here. Of course, there are the pre-requisite scenes of mounting tension and nerve-racking action, but they only serve as support for the central arc of the film.
I was truly riveted by the central couple, Andrew and Sam. Like so many film couples before them, their initially strained relationship evolves into something more over the course of the movie. However, this one is beautifully written and magnificently acted by McNairy and Able. The very last thing I expected to say about “Monsters”, before I sat down to watch it, was that it was an actor’s movie. I am not kidding when I say that both leads should be considered for Oscar nominations. McNairy has the charm and wit of a leading man. Whitney Able is graceful and subtle here, deeply thoughtful and understated throughout.
And I would be remiss without mentioning Gareth Edwards, who wrote and directed this film on a shoestring. His work is ten times better than the biggest Hollywood blockbusters we get every year. I can’t believe how restrained and poignant his film is. “Monsters” is everything a film like this usually isn’t. It is smart. It is deep. It is haunting. It is patient. It is real. It is one of the 10 Best Films of 2010.
![]()






This film was one of the biggest disappointments of 2010.
The work of the actors is great, though the storyline is one of the most boring i can imagine.
A man has to bring the daughter of his boss home, they have to survive the “infected zone” and fall in love- but they won’t see many aliens as well as you won’t be confronted with deeper psychologic horror- from the beginnig on, it is visible that Andrew and Sam won’t die.
Of course, i do not want to advise some bloody-massacre-style movies, but as one could see in (for example) Cloverfield, the story of surviving (or not surviving) an apocalypse could be delivered much more interesting and thrilling.
The best thing that might happen to you during this movie is to fall asleep.
>>> spoilers in this comment <<<
Thank you for posting fireflyer. I want to address a couple of points. There is not deep psychological horror because it is not a horror movie. You don't see too many aliens because this is not an alien movie. This is a love story. People should know what type of movie they are getting into. I don't go to see "Toy Story" and expect to see nudity. I do my research before I see a film. It is the responsibility of the viewer to know what they are about to watch… not the responsibility of the director to make the film that people want.
SPOILER ALERT
Also — you said that "from the beginning on, it is visible that Andrew and Sam won’t die". Well, they do die. Do you remember the very first scene in the movie? Maybe you missed it. Maybe if you had paid attention, you might not have missed it.
Thanks again for posting… despite missing the "actual movie".